I want my A-Space
Canyon | December 3, 2008I’ve been reading Mark Drapeau’s Mashable column and am really excited about the Government 2.0 directions that he is talking about. I’m also frustrated, as he is, at the pace and lack of leadership that these efforts are receiving. But one of the most interesting parts was his description of A-Space.
The big development in IC social networking tools hitting the news recently is A-Space, essentially a mashup of Facebook, LinkedIn, and GoogleDocs designed to be an addictive work environment for analysts with access to sensitive human intelligence (HUMINT). A-Space will have status updates a la Twitter, subscriptions to updates, feeds and friends, activity streams, content management a la Sharepoint, a community grid tag cloud, RSS feeds from outside, drag and drop capability, discussion/question threads, a ’scrapbook,’ and widgets.
But most importantly he finishes with this revelation.
This system – frankly better than anything I know about in the private sector at the moment – should increase collaboration and analytical thinking.
A-Space’s launch is a great opportunity for the internal communications of the government to get a much needed upgrade. And I’m all for the US Government taking advantage of great ideas for social networking. I just want them to share with the rest of us. I know first hand how the lack of internal tools can motivate users to take advantage of public sites or implement their own solutions. I would love to make a resource like A-Space available to my users. Currently we are using an internal Wiki and an IM and IRC server and while these tools have served us well they are limited in scope. I can imagine how a locally hosted service with the above listed features could offer a great opportunity for increased collaboration, especially across different teams and business divisions.
More importantly than the affect that this could have on my own company, I think about all the other small and medium sized companies who could really benefit from an A-Space. Having a centralized, easy to deploy, managed social network that lives within the corporate firewall could quickly open communication channels and build the relationships that most of the actual work at companies is based on. It is the implementation of tools like these that give us IT professionals an opportunity to have a substantial and lasing impact on not only the company but the effectiveness of individual employees.
There are, of course, several commercial options including from tech giants Microsoft and IBM. These solutions are usually best suited for companies that have existing installations that already use these company’s technologies. There are also open source projects working in this direction but they don’t seem to be as feature complete and robust as A-Space sounds.
This leads to the ongoing discussion of open source and government. If the taxpayer’s money was used to create software, the argument goes, then the taxpayers should benefit from that investment. I think the reuse by other departments and the release from vendor lock-in are better reasons for government projects to be created under an open source license. I understand the government’s desire to keep some things out of the public eye and under raps. I know that many security related projects wouldn’t be open sourced for fear of someone finding an exploitable bug. Yet I think that A-Space is a perfect example of the kind of government project that should be open and available to the general public. The value in this system is the content, personal connections it allows, and it’s internal access controls not the code of the system itself. The government could benefit greatly from any outside development done by the open source community that would develop around such a product. I understand that any community code would be meticulously reviewed before use inside any government network. But this code review would still cost less, in developer time, than developing the same features from scratch.
So just as President-Elect Obama has embraced Creative Commons for the Change.gov site, I hope that A-Space is released as an open source project so that others can benefit from and contribute to this resource. In the absence of this unlikely event, I hope that the open source community takes this as an opportunity to step up and create the missing A-Space for me and everyone else.






I understand the need to return taxpayer investment to citizens,
thedrake000 | December 3, 2008 | 11:15 amI understand the need to return taxpayer investment to citizens, but the logic here does not track. Should the government release the information to make a tank?
No, they shouldn't release schematics for at tank, but what
Canyon | December 3, 2008 | 3:07 pmNo, they shouldn’t release schematics for at tank, but what I’m talking about isn’t the plans for a tank. I’m talking about a software product that, while more advanced and full featured then other packages, doesn’t bring any novel or unreproducible technology with it. The value that A-Space brings to the government is the content within it not any secret about how it was constructed. Releasing the code behind A-Space wouldn’t reveal any classified secrets or even open up the government’s internal A-Space to any possible attacks because it isn’t accessible to the public. It might even make it more secure if an open review of the code reveals any potential problems that can then be fixed.
But more importantly, releasing the plans to a tank would only be useful to rival tank manufactures and those trying to discover weaknesses in the tank design. Releasing A-Space would be useful to any company or group who would benefit from a centralized social information sharing site, like mine and maybe even yours.
I think, Canyon, what you are arguing is that the
kevincurry.blogspot.com/ | December 3, 2008 | 8:45 pmI think, Canyon, what you are arguing is that the solution is to reduce the problem to: 1) create a safe virtual space in which people can operate safely. 2) deploy common collaboration and social networking tools in the space. Do I have it about right? I hope so because it seems a good starting point.
Yes, that is correct. But I feel there are some
Canyon | December 3, 2008 | 10:58 pmYes, that is correct. But I feel there are some details that are important in understanding the context.
1) “Safe” is a subjective term. Users might feel safe with a “private” page on Facebook or MySpace. Yet companies wouldn’t feel “safe” with employees posting corporate info or discussing internal details on that same page. They would want a system that is controlled by their IT staff and therefor subject to the protections and controls they feel “safe” with. By extension, users will feel safer posting to the internal, officially sanctioned, site because they don’t have fear of saying something sensitive in a public forum. There are still the political concerns around what is posted, but those exist in all corporate communications.
2) The exact function and format for the tools is, hopefully, up to the implementers but the A-Space product seems to have more features and capabilities than any other products currently available. I’m really wishing out loud that someone will take the lack of such a product on the public market as an opportunity and attempt to fill that void. But as you say, it is just a starting point.